Notes on the Fall of 2010

I apologize for lying about blogging Adorno. It’s coming, I promise. In the meantime, it is fall again in Buffalo. This is my second fall here, and I have learned a lot since I arrived here. Many of the things I have learned came the hard way. One of these things was about how politics works in this city and in New York State.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that SUNY has suffered an enormous budget cut from the government, something to the tune of $280 million. What was kind of a surprise for me was that, in the state budget that finally passed last month, neither UB2020, nor its more expansive incarnation, the Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act, were included. And some people are unfairly taking the heat as being anti-Western New York for their resistance to the steamrolling force that is business.

I have friends who work for Senator Antoine Thompson, and I think he’s a pretty solid guy. One of the things he has come out against with regard to PHEEIA is its absolute disregard for labor. I’m glad that someone is taking a stand in WNY against this sellout of the SUNY system, but there are some smart, powerful, energetic people who should be standing up for more than just our jobs. Us.

As I extend a welcome to the new students here at UB this fall, I want to remind everyone — tenured professor, freshman, adjunct faculty, facilities staff, the community — that a university is more than an economic force. A university provides something singular and important. Or, I should say, it should provide something singular and important. We must not give into corporate interests, because the reason we are here is because we value inquisitiveness, innovation, and that ever-essential but increasingly-elusive benefit of working in the academy, academic freedom.

One of the critiques that the PHEEIA crowd levels against us is that we have no viable alternative plan. I want to unpack this for this fall, because it’s important we start thinking about it.

There’s some level on which we’re caught in a bit of a Catch-22 with the administration. I have my doubts about the receptiveness of the administration to collaborating on an alternate plan, considering how much time and energy (and social capital) President Simpson poured into UB2020. But I also have grave misgivings about how receptive the administration would actually be to a plan developed not by consultants and administrators, but by students and faculty.

Last night I watched Carl Malamud give a talk at the WWW2010 conference called “10 Rules for Radicals.” While the talk is focused on Malamud’s experiences working as a radical on the early Internet, opening standards and creating accessibility both to technology and public domain information, the ten rules scale up and down, and they apply to everything from technology and media to government and law.

Rule #1 is treat everything as an experiment. This fall is an experiment. We have the latitude to build something great here, something that runs alongside the current system. That experimental system can be tweaked and improved, and in the future, inform the mainstream. But we have to start doing something, and we have to start doing it now.

Start that reading group. Teach your class a different way. Commit to an activity on campus. Make a promise to yourself about how you’re going to live your life for the next four months, and then stick to it. But most importantly, don’t stop talking about these big issues. These next few years may be the last we have to make a substantive change to the way our institutions are managed, and they cannot be wasted. Join me in making the university what it can and should be, in spite of what it is and is becoming.

Welcome back to Buffalo, people. Let’s make this happen.


Blogging Aesthetic Theory

I’ve been slowly working through Theodor Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory for this major paper I’m going to be writing this semester. Josephine gave me a hard time about starting my reading for the independent study she’s directing me in before the semester starts, but I don’t think I’m going to regret my not-so-light summer reading. I’ve


Digital Gentrification

In my opinion, Foursquare was problematic enough. While it encourages users to go out and discover new things in their cities, it’s also largely focused on going out and spending money. When considering these kinds of services, most people are immediately concerned with privacy and security, and for good reason. Now Facebook, with its sketchy


The Ultimate Meta-Game

This is a post that will probably get me into trouble, but I think I should write about it anyway. I just got back from a marathon session of Magic: The Gathering with Luke, Adam, and Adam’s friend Keith. You must understand I’ve avoided Magic: The Gathering mostly because I knew it was pricey. And


Re-emerging

I can say with some relief that the first iteration of play/share beyond/in happened and everything went better than I had expected it to. I’ve been working on notes for the postmortem, as well as getting feedback from players and volunteers. This particular postmortem will be useful because the project isn’t actually over — feedback


In the Zone

I haven’t been writing here recently because I’ve been so busy with play/share beyond/in stuff. This weekend the game launches and there’s a lot of work to be done, not just by myself but also by others for whom I am responsible. So, most of my waking hours (and the number of waking hours a


Black Mountain III

What does it mean to call yourself Black Mountain III? What kinds of expectations, obligations, and implications do you invoke by using names like Black Mountain, Charles Olson, and Robert Creeley? Why should you invoke the idea of Black Mountain in this era of higher education? How should an organization calling itself Black Mountain III


Figuring the Humanities in the Corporate University

Recently I read Masao Miyoshi’s essay “Ivory Tower in Escrow.” [PDF] Perhaps as a follow-up to yesterday’s post about the troubles and travails of Antioch College, this seems very timely. As a follow-up to the university politics I’ve been involved in, it seems critical. Miyoshi’s essay is absolutely worth the read for anybody involved in


When the Shock Doctrine Touches Higher Education

In 1973, a U.S.-supported coup occurred in Chile, ousting the democratically elected — but politically and economically beleaguered — Allende administration, and installing General Augusto Pinochet as dictator. Pinochet’s rule is now remembered as being brutal and corporatist, selling off Chile’s nationalized resources to private investors, and accumulating quite the list of human rights violations.


“Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games”

This is not intended to be a comprehensive review of this book, but I kind of wanted to jot down some ideas I had about it. I just finished it yesterday. It was recommended to me by Guy, who I met in Shaun Irlam’s Literature of/and Human Rights course we took together last term. Stephanie